From ed8b1d6d2c741ab26d60d499d7fbb7ac801f0f51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 12:02:32 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ALSA: timer: Fix race between stop and interrupt
Git-commit: ed8b1d6d2c741ab26d60d499d7fbb7ac801f0f51
Patch-mainline: 4.5-rc4
References: bsc#968018

A slave timer element also unlinks at snd_timer_stop() but it takes
only slave_active_lock.  When a slave is assigned to a master,
however, this may become a race against the master's interrupt
handling, eventually resulting in a list corruption.  The actual bug
could be seen with a syzkaller fuzzer test case in BugLink below.

As a fix, we need to take timeri->timer->lock when timer isn't NULL,
i.e. assigned to a master, while the assignment to a master itself is
protected by slave_active_lock.

Buglink: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CACT4Y+Y_Bm+7epAb=8Wi=AaWd+DYS7qawX52qxdCfOfY49vozQ@mail.gmail.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

---
 sound/core/timer.c |    4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

--- a/sound/core/timer.c
+++ b/sound/core/timer.c
@@ -504,9 +504,13 @@ static int _snd_timer_stop(struct snd_ti
 			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&slave_active_lock, flags);
 			return -EBUSY;
 		}
+		if (timeri->timer)
+			spin_lock(&timeri->timer->lock);
 		timeri->flags &= ~SNDRV_TIMER_IFLG_RUNNING;
 		list_del_init(&timeri->ack_list);
 		list_del_init(&timeri->active_list);
+		if (timeri->timer)
+			spin_unlock(&timeri->timer->lock);
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&slave_active_lock, flags);
 		goto __end;
 	}
